Our Nuclear Verdicts® Resource Center provides insights, analysis, and solutions!
Get the Book and Learn the Methods for Preventing Nuclear Verdicts®
How We Are Stopping Nuclear Verdicts®
The innovative insurtech company, helping insurance carriers identify, manage, and reduce the risk of Nuclear Verdicts®. Using patent-pending AI technology, our software, NaVelTM, matches key traits to your files to determine the likelihood your case could go nuclear!
The “Special Forces” of Tyson & Mendes trial attorneys, supporting clients with high-risk cases that could result in Nuclear Verdicts®. TM HALO® partners have a strong track record of success. They are experienced litigators specializing in various industries and have a reputation for excellence. TM HALO® is called upon by insurance companies and corporations to handle their most complex cases throughout the country.
June 8–11, 2023 | San Diego, CA
A four-day educational program for experienced defense attorneys. Based on principles of the best-selling book Nuclear Verdicts®: Defending Justice for All, the Nuclear Verdicts Defense Institute teaches proven strategies to prevent Nuclear Verdicts® through presentations and practical activities. This is the chance for defense counsel to learn and practice these methods without clients or plaintiffs’ counsel watching!
“Thinking Out Loud” About Ed Sheeran’s Use of The Nuclear Verdict Defense Methods
Nuclear Verdicts®: How Can Insurers Protect Themselves?
Schaefer City Technologies Launches with First Software Product to Help Insurers Identify, Manage, and Reduce Nuclear Verdicts®: New Insurtech Startup Created by Author of “the Book” on Nuclear Verdicts® and Longtime Insurance Executive
Tyson & Mendes' Nuclear Verdicts® Tracker tracks cases driving the alarming trend in excessively large damages awarded by juries. These cases were defended by other law firms without using Tyson & Mendes' methods. Could the T&M methods have stopped these Nuclear Verdicts®? When applied correctly, YES!
Decedent was prescribed an opioid for pancreatitis. His doctors did not ask whether decedent had sleep apnea. If they had asked, additional precautions would have been taken during decedent's treatment with opioids. Decedent fell into a coma and eventually died. Jurors awarded $20 million.
Decedent was on the sidewalk when an SUV struck her. At the time, the SUV's driver had abused nitrous oxide. Her parents sued not only the driver, but also the distrubtor of Whip-It! and the smoke shop that sold Whip-It! to the driver. Jurors awarded $745 million, finding the driver only 10% liable, the smoke shop 20%, and the distributor 70%.
Decedent was in a hospital after his respiratory collapse. A doctor treated him with 27 doses of Dilaudid within 28 hours. Jurors awarded $20.2 million for plaintiffs, the decedent's wife and son.
Plaintiff had his CDL for driving and an exemption from physical standards for interstate truckers. He applied for a job and was told he would not be able to satisfy their training requirements. To communicate with the trainer, he would have to look away from the road. The EEOC sued for ADA violations. Jurors awarded $36 million.
Plaintiiff's son was shot and killed by two police officers who used excessive force. Decedent had been in the opposite direction of the officers. Jurors awarded $23.8 million.