Our Nuclear Verdicts® Resource Center provides insights, analysis, and solutions!
Get the Book and Learn the Methods for Preventing Nuclear Verdicts®
How We Are Stopping Nuclear Verdicts®
The innovative insurtech company, helping insurance carriers identify, manage, and reduce the risk of Nuclear Verdicts®. Using patent-pending AI technology, our software, NaVel™, matches key traits to your files to determine the likelihood your case could go nuclear!
The “Special Forces” of Tyson & Mendes trial attorneys, supporting clients with high-risk cases that could result in Nuclear Verdicts®. TM HALO® partners have a strong track record of success. They are experienced litigators specializing in various industries and have a reputation for excellence. TM HALO® is called upon by insurance companies and corporations to handle their most complex cases throughout the country.
July 18 – 21, 2024 | San Diego, CA
A four-day educational program for experienced defense attorneys. Based on principles of the best-selling book Nuclear Verdicts®: Defending Justice for All, the Nuclear Verdicts Defense Institute teaches proven strategies to prevent Nuclear Verdicts® through presentations and practical activities. This is the chance for defense counsel to learn and practice these methods without clients or plaintiffs’ counsel watching!
Tyson & Mendes' Nuclear Verdicts® Tracker tracks cases driving the alarming trend in excessively large damages awarded by juries. These cases were defended by other law firms without using Tyson & Mendes' methods. Could the T&M methods have stopped these Nuclear Verdicts®? When applied correctly, YES!
Decedent was exposed to asbestos products and got mesothelioma. She died, and her family sued the company which manufactured the products. Jurors awarded $45 million.
Decedent was killed in a crash. The other driver pled guilty to misdemeanor vehicular homicide. His family sued. Jurors awarded $28 million.
Plaintiff was driving a motorcycle when he got into a crash and was paralyzed. His motorcycle brakes were defective, and the company knew of the defect. Jurors awarded $20 million.
Plaintiff was working undercover at a protest. After other officers beat him, he sued. The judge awarded $23.5 million.
Decedent smoked for decades. After he died of throat cancer related to his smoking, his family sued, alleging the company intentionally hid the dangers related to smoking. Jurors awarded $34.7 million.
The Party Who Controls the Narrative Controls the Outcome in Trial
Jury Awards a Record-Breaking $120 Million in New York Medical Malpractice Case
Top 10 Voir Dire Questions to Detect and Dismiss Nuclear Jurors