Complex Trial Team

Complex Trial Team

We resolve many cases before trial, but without a doubt, certain cases will go before a jury. As a trial powerhouse, Tyson & Mendes’ Complex Trial Team represents clients in their highest-risk and most complex courtroom disputes. The team is often “parachuted in” shortly before trial to successfully triage tense, high-stakes litigation. For this reason, we stand out for our superb ability to handle the most complicated, hotly contested trials in the country. Mina Miserlis is the Chair of Complex Trials.

The Complex Trial Team has tried to jury verdict a wide variety of lawsuits, ranging from employment, professional liability, business and accounting fraud, significant real estate disputes, class actions, catastrophic injury, traumatic brain injury, complex regional pain syndrome, and wrongful death. The team also has a successful track record of jury trial experience in large loss cases.

Each member of the Complex Trial Team has received extensive training in the Tyson & Mendes methods for stopping Nuclear Verdicts®, and in turn, they now instruct others. Several members of the team are TM HALO® trial attorneys, parachuting in to work with our clients on their highest risk cases with the greatest potential for Nuclear Verdicts® and deliver justice.

The Complex Trial Team has tried lawsuits against some of the most well-known plaintiff’s attorneys in the country, including Nick Rowley, Gary Dordick, R. Rex Paris, Michael Alder, Rodger Dryer, Casey Geary, Taylor & Ring, and others. The Tyson & Mendes Complex Trial Team tries big cases against big name attorneys – and wins.

Contact Us for a Complex Trial Attorney in your area.

• News
• Insights

Nearly $2M Saved for Defendant in Three-Car Motor Vehicle Accident

May 29, 2026 9:57am

National insurance defense trial firm Tyson & Mendes, LLP announced today a favorable verdict in a three-car motor vehicle accident involving four people. Plaintiff’s highest demand was for $2 million. Plaintiff alleged she suffered severe injuries as a result of the subject car accident, and plaintiff’s counsel urged jurors to return substantial damages...

Defense Verdict in High-Exposure California Sexual Abuse and Molestation Case

May 6, 2026 8:00am

National insurance defense trial firm Tyson & Mendes, LLP announced today it secured a complete defense verdict in a high-exposure sexual abuse and molestation (SAM) trial involving a case in California where the plaintiff’s demand reached $20 million...

Law, Disrupted with: Robert Tyson and Cayce E. Lynch

January 23, 2026 3:28pm

John is joined by Robert Tyson and Cayce E. Lynch, both partners at Tyson & Mendes and Co-Founders of Apex Defense Consulting. They discuss how defense lawyers can counter the recent rise in “nuclear verdicts.” Nuclear verdicts are extremely large jury awards, often in personal injury cases, in which pain and suffering or emotional distress awards are vastly disproportionate to economic damages...

What Really Defines a Nuclear Verdict (And Why the Dollar Amount Keeps Moving)

January 7, 2026 4:43pm

Industry experts break down why nuclear verdicts aren’t defined by a fixed dollar amount anymore, but by verdicts that are wildly disproportionate to the facts—making social inflation a risk everyone now shares. Watch this sneak peek into an interview from the Risky Future Summit with hosts Ezra Amacher and Allen Laman and Ashley Fetyko of Tyson & Mendes...

Launching Our Second Book: Nuclear Verdicts®: The Apex – Break the Pattern

October 28, 2025 12:38pm

National civil defense firm Tyson & Mendes LLP announced today the publication of its second book, Nuclear Verdicts®: The Apex – Break the Pattern, co-authored by Founding Partner Robert F. Tyson, Jr. and National Managing Partner Cayce E. Lynch...

View More

Anatomy of a $12 Million Verdict—Part One: How the Apex Could Have Changed the Trajectory of a Warren County Trucking Case

Author: David J. Guzik | May 20, 2026 1:13pm

On February 5, 2026, a Warren County, New Jersey jury returned a $12 million verdict—$4 million in compensatory damages and an additional $8 million in punitive damages—against a small trucking company and its driver in the first civil jury trial held in that county in approximately thirteen years. The case, Vieira v. BJJ Enterprises, LLC, (WRN-L-047-22), involved a rear-end tractor-trailer collision on Route 78 East in...

Tyson & Mendes Saves Clients $785,663,510 in 2025

December 15, 2025 1:35pm

These are the matters that tested strategy, demanded discipline, and delivered results. Take a closer look at the major cases we tried this year and learn how our approach helped drive fair outcomes in high-stakes litigation...

The Apex Approach to Arguing Pain and Suffering: How to Stop Nuclear Verdicts®

Author: Clark R. Conforti | December 15, 2025 1:25pm

No one is promised a life without pain, despite what plaintiffs’ attorneys want juries to think. However, defense counsel often fails to present any rebuttal evidence or closing argument to assist the jury in determining the reasonable amount of the plaintiff’s pain and suffering damages.[i] When a jury returns a Nuclear Verdict®, the damages for pain and suffering (i.e., noneconomic damages) are often the...

Reaching The Apex: Why We Used Data to Prove Nuclear Verdicts® Can Be Stopped

Author: Cayce E. Lynch, Robert Tyson | October 20, 2025 10:12am

Nuclear Verdicts® have been an escalating problem for a long, long time — but the insurance defense industry has remained largely stagnant, even in the face of an ever-evolving and

It’s All Legalese to Me: How Taking Responsibility Can Help Avoid Liability

Author: Samantha Epstein | October 17, 2025 2:37pm

In the legal world, we use many words to talk about people and legal concepts which can sound intimidating: plaintiff, defendant, proximate cause. The plaintiff is the person “who initiates a lawsuit...” The defendant is the person who allegedly wronged the plaintiff. The plaintiff must prove...

View more

• Complex Trial Team
• Jury Verdicts
• Nuclear Verdicts