Photo of Complex Trial Team

Complex Trial Team

We resolve many cases before trial, but without a doubt, certain cases will go before a jury. As a trial powerhouse, Tyson & Mendes’ Complex Trial Team represents clients in their highest-risk and most complex courtroom disputes. The team is often “parachuted in” shortly before trial to successfully triage tense, high-stakes litigation. For this reason, we stand out for our superb ability to handle the most complicated, hotly contested trials in the country. Mina Miserlis is the Chair of Complex Trials.

The Complex Trial Team has tried to jury verdict a wide variety of lawsuits, ranging from employment, professional liability, business and accounting fraud, significant real estate disputes, class actions, catastrophic injury, traumatic brain injury, complex regional pain syndrome, and wrongful death. The team also has a successful track record of jury trial experience in large loss cases.

Each member of the Complex Trial Team has received extensive training in the Tyson & Mendes methods for stopping Nuclear Verdicts®, and in turn, they now instruct others. Several members of the team are TM HALO® trial attorneys, parachuting in to work with our clients on their highest risk cases with the greatest potential for Nuclear Verdicts® and deliver justice.

The Complex Trial Team has tried lawsuits against some of the most well-known plaintiff’s attorneys in the country, including Nick Rowley, Gary Dordick, R. Rex Paris, Michael Alder, Rodger Dryer, Casey Geary, Taylor & Ring, and others. The Tyson & Mendes Complex Trial Team tries big cases against big name attorneys – and wins.

Contact Us for a Complex Trial Attorney in your area.

Law, Disrupted with: Robert Tyson and Cayce E. Lynch

January 23, 2026 3:28pm
John is joined by Robert Tyson and Cayce E. Lynch, both partners at Tyson & Mendes and Co-Founders of Apex Defense Consulting. They discuss how defense lawyers can counter the recent rise in “nuclear verdicts.” Nuclear verdicts are extremely large jury awards, often in personal injury cases, in which pain and suffering or emotional distress awards are vastly disproportionate to economic damages...

What Really Defines a Nuclear Verdict (And Why the Dollar Amount Keeps Moving)

January 7, 2026 4:43pm
Industry experts break down why nuclear verdicts aren’t defined by a fixed dollar amount anymore, but by verdicts that are wildly disproportionate to the facts—making social inflation a risk everyone now shares. Watch this sneak peek into an interview from the Risky Future Summit with hosts Ezra Amacher and Allen Laman and Ashley Fetyko of Tyson & Mendes...

Combating Nuclear Verdicts® with Humanity and Technology

June 5, 2025 11:09am
In a recent CLM webinar, Cayce Lynch, national managing partner; and Ashley Fetyko, partner, head of growth and client engagement, both with Tyson and Mendes LLP, discussed the alarming rise of Nuclear Verdicts and introduced a new framework to combat them...

View More

Tyson & Mendes Saves Clients $785,663,510 in 2025

December 15, 2025 1:35pm
These are the matters that tested strategy, demanded discipline, and delivered results. Take a closer look at the major cases we tried this year and learn how our approach helped drive fair outcomes in high-stakes litigation...

The Apex Approach to Arguing Pain and Suffering: How to Stop Nuclear Verdicts®

Author: Clark R. Conforti | December 15, 2025 1:25pm
No one is promised a life without pain, despite what plaintiffs’ attorneys want juries to think. However, defense counsel often fails to present any rebuttal evidence or closing argument to assist the jury in determining the reasonable amount of the plaintiff’s pain and suffering damages.[i] When a jury returns a Nuclear Verdict®, the damages for pain and suffering (i.e., noneconomic damages) are often the...
Ready to Join Our
Complex Trial Team Team?

Open Roles