Preparation for a trial can be a complex and meticulous process which requires a combination of analysis and strategic thinking. Success in the courtroom largely depends on preparation, and trial preparation through collaboration ensures an attorney can present a compelling case to the judge and jury, anticipate the opposing party’s moves, and respond to unexpected developments. Below are some of the key aspects of the collaborative process leading up to a trial.

1. Case Analysis

The first step in preparing for trial is to analyze the case in depth. The trial lawyer must thoroughly review all the facts, evidence, and legal issues involved. This process involves reviewing the case thoroughly to understand all of its strengths and weaknesses. Collaboration with colleagues allows “fresh eyes” to review the applicable facts and law that could impact the outcome. Re-analysis with the help of colleagues can shape or focus arguments, motions, and strategies to align with legal principles.

2. Developing a Theme

Once the lawyer understands the facts of the case and the legal issues, they must devise a clear theme. This includes determining the objectives for the trial, how to present the case effectively, and how to attack the opposing side’s arguments. A strong theme should outline key points the lawyer will emphasize and the evidence they intend to introduce.

Core themes that will most resonate with juries involve responsibility, reasonableness, and common sense. For instance, accepting responsibility neutralizes jury anger. Being reasonable and accepting incontrovertible facts aligns with the jury’s directive to determine the reasonableness of the parties’ overall conduct. Further, common sense must not be forgotten because it can lead a jury to favor your position despite other unfavorable evidence.[i]

Colleagues can assist greatly with theme development and refining arguments, as well as anticipating the arguments the opposing counsel might present. Developing a trial strategy is a dynamic process, and refinement with other lawyers better allows the trial lawyer to adjust and refine the approach as new perspectives become available.

3. Client Witness Preparation

Client witnesses are critical to the success of any trial. Preparing client witnesses properly is one of the most important aspects of trial preparation. A lawyer must meet with potential witnesses to review and vet their testimony, ensure they understand what will be expected of them, and help them feel comfortable in the courtroom setting.

This practice of collaboration with the client and its witnesses should address the questions they may face during examination. They should also address the uncomfortable questions that the witnesses do not want to be asked during their testimony. This process can guide the witnesses on appropriate demeanor, how to answer questions clearly, and how to handle any delicate situations that might arise during questioning.

4. Trial Rehearsals and Mock Trials

Finally, an expanding arena for complex trials involves third-party collaboration through mock trials or trial rehearsals. These simulations are valuable because they allow the trial attorney to refine arguments, test strategies, and practice dealing with unexpected arguments or presentations by an opponent. Mock trials can provide valuable feedback and help a lawyer feel more confident and prepared when the actual trial begins.

Conclusion

Trial preparation is a multi-faceted process that requires attention to every aspect of a case. Effective collaboration enhances a lawyer’s ability to strategize, research, prepare witnesses, organize evidence, and anticipate challenges. In short, it plays a significant role in achieving success in the courtroom.

Tyson & Mendes recognizes these benefits of collaboration through its team-oriented trial approach and the firm’s trial strategy meetings that ensure that our trial lawyers are prepared to represent their clients effectively and fight for a favorable outcome.

Keep Reading

My Top Three Favorite Time Management Hacks as an Associate Attorney Whose Burden Is It Anyway? Misclassification Under the FLSA May Expose Employers to Expanded Liability The Power of Play: Hobbies Make Me a Better Lawyer, And Make Us All Better People The Fate of State Tort Claims in the Trucking Industry: SCOTUS To Decide In Montgomery v. Caribe Transport II, LLC Getting Pickled: Pickleball Paddle Company Sued Over Mislabeled Paddles; Court Recommends Preliminary Settlement Approval Blind Spots and Deep Pockets: Apportionment After the $45 Million Zemo Verdict Medical Center of Central Georgia, Inc. v. Turner: $7.2 Million Jury Award in Wrongful Death Case Pennsylvania Legislature Considers Law to Permit Specification, and Anchoring, of Noneconomic Damages Figures by Plaintiffs’ Attorneys in Civil Jury Trials

More by this author

Misclassification Under the FLSA May Expose Employers to Expanded Liability Pennsylvania Legislature Considers Law to Permit Specification, and Anchoring, of Noneconomic Damages Figures by Plaintiffs’ Attorneys in Civil Jury Trials Misclassification Under the FLSA May Expose Employers to Expanded Liability Recent Philadelphia Product Liability Suit Underscores Challenging Legal Climate for Manufacturers in Pennsylvania Collaboration Is Key to Preparation in the Weeks Before Trial Philadelphia County Continues Trend of Large Verdicts to Sympathetic Plaintiffs in Recent Medical Malpractice Litigation Pennsylvania Abuse Settlement Reinforces Importance of Background Checks in Business Operation Immunizing Against Wrongful Termination Claims: How Pennsylvania Employers Can Avoid Costly Claims by At-Will Employees Kicked Off the Team: College Football Doctor Wins Big in Wrongful Termination Case

Sources

[i] See Robert F. Tyson, Jr., NUCLEAR VERDICTS: DEFENDING JUSTICE FOR ALL 97- 111 (1^st ed. 2020).