fbpx

Victoria Hightower - Senior Counsel

Victoria Hightower is Senior Counsel in Tyson & Mendes’ Las Vegas office. Her practice includes general liability and personal injury litigation.

Ms. Hightower has extensive litigation experience, including representing individuals and businesses in Nevada state courts and in federal district courts. Ms. Hightower has practiced in the areas of insurance defense, business litigation, mortgage banking, and real estate law.  Ms. Hightower has successfully argued appellate matters before the Nevada Supreme Court and the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal.  She also served as Assistant Bar Counsel, in which she investigated and prosecuted instances of attorney misconduct. She first chaired five trials concerning attorney misconduct.

Ms. Hightower obtained her J.D. from Georgetown University Law Center in 2007, where she was an Advocate on the Barrister’s Council, Appellate Advocacy Division and placed as a semi- finalist in the William E. Leahy Moot Court Competition.  She was also a member of the first place team in the Frederick Douglass Moot Court Competition, Mid-Atlantic Division. She obtained her B.A. from the University of California at Los Angeles in 2003, where she was a member of Sigma Tau Delta National English Honor Society.

In her free time, Ms. Hightower enjoys playing softball and participating in obstacle races. She also enjoys reading, traveling, and oil painting.

Recent Posts

Nevada Clarifies Service of a NRS Chapter 40 Notice During the Grace Period Does Not Toll Statute of Repose

In 2015, the Nevada legislature enacted Assembly Bill (A.B.) 125, which increased the time for bringing an action for construction defects from six years to ten years.  See NRS 11.202(1). Also of note, NRS 11.202(2) adds language allowing a claim to be brought at any time, i.e. without any limitations period, after substantial completion for “any act of fraud in causing a deficiency in the design, planning, supervision or observation of construction or the…

Nevada Clarifies the Factors a Court Must Consider When Determining Whether Excusable Neglect Exists

NRCP 60(b)(1) provides that a district court may grant relief “from a final judgment, order or proceeding” based on a showing of “mistake, inadvertence, surprise or excusable neglect.” NRCP 60(b)(1).  This has given rise to the question of what exactly the court must consider when determining whether excusable neglect exists, and in what instances the court must make these considerations.

Nevada Courts Are Opening Up; What Will That Look Like?

On March 12, 2020, Nevada Governor Steve Sisolak issued a Declaration of Emergency in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.  On March 13, 2020, the President of the United States declared a nationwide emergency pursuant to §501(6) of the Robert T. Stanford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 5121-5207.  To mitigate the spread of COVID-19, the Center for Disease Control recommended social distancing and mandated wearing facemasks.  Governor Sisolak, in Directive 021…

Copyright © 2021 Tyson & Mendes LLP. All Rights Reserved. Website by Big Behavior.