Cayce Greiner is the firm’s Administrative Partner based in Tyson & Mendes’ San Diego office. In this capacity, she wears multiple hats – directing Tyson & Mendes’ administrative, marketing, and business development activities, and has taken the firm through a period of unprecedented growth.
By developing a series of marketing initiatives, Ms. Greiner has helped the firm more than double its size and raise its profile. She founded and chairs the firm’s Women’s Initiative, providing mentoring and support for the firm’s female attorneys and clients. In addition, she oversees its Young Professionals Group, promoting growth and facilitating business development for young attorneys and insurance professionals. Ms. Greiner trains all firm attorneys through T&M University and oversees T&M Giving, a firm-wide community relations program.
A tenacious and established defense attorney, Ms. Greiner collaborates with defense litigation teams across every Tyson & Mendes office to achieve exceptional, efficient results in cases involving complex issues, catastrophic injury, or potential high exposure. Ms. Greiner has successfully resolved a variety of cases involving complex business, personal injury, and insurance coverage disputes. She has coordinated numerous full trial preparations in high exposure cases, including defense theme development, expert witness retention and opinion formulation, witness examinations, pre-trial motions, and trial presentations. Ms. Greiner also leads Tyson & Mendes’ Autonomous Vehicles practice group.
Ms. Greiner also regularly presents CE and MCLE updates on California law, including the landmark Howell v. Hamilton Meats decision and its progeny, to insurance professionals across the U.S. She currently serves on the national CLM Alternative Dispute Resolution Committee. In 2017, Ms. Greiner won San Diego Business Journal’s “Business Women of the Year” Award for her work on behalf of the firm. San Diego Metro selected her as a Top 40 Under 40 in 2018.
Ms. Greiner earned her J.D., cum laude, in 2011 from the William S. Richardson School of Law, University of Hawaii at Manoa, where she served as the Outside Articles Editor for the University of Hawaii Law Review. After graduation, she clerked at the Hawaii Supreme Court for Associate Justice James Duffy. Ms. Greiner is licensed to practice law in California and Colorado.
In her free time, Ms. Greiner enjoys being active outdoors, visiting her family in Colorado, and learning to knit. She is perpetually in search of the best burrito in Southern California.
Recent PostsFirst Self-Driving Car Accidents: a Potential Speed Bump for Manufacturers?
While examination of potential autonomous vehicle liability has heightened in recent years, questions remain as to how to attribute fault in an incident involving self-driving vehicles. Two recent incidents involving autonomous vehicles raise questions among insurers and manufacturers.Driverless Cars Put Big Change in the Fast Lane
Some experts and research analysts predict autonomous vehicles will take over personal transportation by 2030, but the reality is they are here now, changing the way many industries do business.New York Women’s Initiative Luncheon
The Confident Woman: Living a Better Balanced and Healthier Life On May 11, 2017, the Tyson & Mendes’ Women’s Initiative held an engaging and thought-provoking luncheon entitled, “The Confident Woman:Howell Update: Another Victory for Defendants
Last week the California Court of Appeal issued another huge victory to defendants by extending the reach of the landmark California Supreme Court Howell v. Hamilton Meats case to include future medical benefits under the Patient Protection and Affordable Healthcare Act (“ACA”). In 2011, Howell sent shock waves through the insurance industry when the Court examined the “billed vs. paid” rule and concluded an injured plaintiff is limited to recovering the discounted amount private health insurance pays on their behalf for as past medical damages, not the inflated amount medical providers bill health insurance companies for their services. (Howell v. Hamilton Meats & Provisions, Inc. (2011) 52 Cal.4th 541.) In 2013, the California Court of Appeal extended Howell‘s “paid” rule to apply to future medical expenses and noneconomic damages. (Cornenbaum v. Lampkin (2013) 215 Cal.App.4th 1308, 1331-1333.)The Confident Woman: Living a Better Balanced and Healthier Life
On March 2, 2017, the Tyson & Mendes’ Women’s Initiative held an engaging and thought-provoking event entitled, “The Confident Woman: Living a Better Balanced and Healthier Life.” At this event, co-sponsored with the Lawyer’s Club of San Diego and San Diego Association of Corporate Counsel, Marjorie Hansen Shaevitz discussed ideas from her book The Confident Woman and the impact of societal pressures on women’s confidence and health. Ms. Hansen Shaevitz provided valuable insight, helpful advice, and useful suggestions for dealing with these pressures in our everyday lives as legal and insurance professionals.Tyson & Mendes Young Professionals: Tips for Overcoming the Millennial Stereotype
Tyson & Mendes is proud to announce the formation of our new Young Professionals Group to support the personal and professional growth of our young attorneys and clients.
To kick off our YP Group, we surveyed TM attorneys of all generations for their best tips to overcome the millennial stereotype. The responses shared common themes – work hard, be prepared, and be patient.Another Open Door for Lawsuits: Supreme Court Issues Plaintiff-Friendly Decision in Federal Employment Discrimination Case
The United States Supreme Court recently held the 45-day period from which a federal employee is required to contact the Equal Employment Opportunity counselor begins to run on the date of the employee’s resignation under a Title VII constructive discharge claim. This 7-1 procedural ruling in Green v. Brennan, 578 U.S. ___ (2016), is plaintiff-friendly and may allow more employees to file discrimination lawsuits.The Reptile Strikes Again: Lessons Learned from the $55M Emotional Distress Jury Verdict Awarded to Erin Andrews
While hindsight is always 20/20, important lessons stem from this jury trial which apply to cases across the country. This article assesses the Andrews trial and provides four “lessons” for businesses, insurance professionals, and defense counsel to avoid runaway jury verdicts: (1) Spot and Slay the Reptile; (2) Accept Responsibility for Something; (3) Always Give a Number, Even When Seeking a Defense Verdict; and (4) Proceed Delicately.Howell Update: Full Medical Bills Allowed Before a Jury Again
For the second time in just four months, a California appellate court has dealt insurance companies a significant setback in the fight against juries considering inflated medical bills.